Registros documentados de la práctica psicológica y nociones de subjetividad implícitas en Argentina (1900-1957). Su articulación con los contextos políticos y áreas preprofesionales. = Documented records from the psychological practice and the subjetivity's notions implicit in Argentina (1900-1957). Its articulation with the political contexts and pre-professional areas.
Tipo de material:
- A.01 J82j Raa
- ABSTRACT Clinical records, biotypological data cards, protocols, interviews, are written documents that register the way in which practices are really carried out. They constitute instances of construction of discursive, conceptual consensus and ways to accede to the practice which guarantee the conditions of knowledge roduction in a determined moment. The historical localization of these documents allows to show the confluence of the social, political and ideological variables in the analysis of them because the material boarded constitutes in the stabilization of a discursive construction’s process which gives an explanation to the elaboration of legitimated knowledge. The study of this matter invites to reflect on the way of understanding the subjectivity, the diagnostic and clinical conception, and the practices that had been possible on each case. This work presents a first approach to the systematization of these records according to the different political contexts, which surrounds its appearance and the emergence of the pre-professional turns involved.
RESUMEN
Historias clínicas, fichas biotipológicas, protocolos, entrevistas son documentos escritos que registran el modo en que las prácticas son efectivamente llevadas a cabo. Constituyen instancias de construcción de consensos discursivos, conceptuales y modos de acceder a la práctica que avalan las condiciones de producción del saber en un momento
eterminado. La contextualización histórica de estos documentos permite mostrar la confluencia de las variables sociales, políticas e ideológicas en el análisis de los mismos ya que el material abordado se constituye en la estabilización de un proceso de construcción discursiva que da cuenta de la elaboración de saberes legitimados. El estudio de esta materia invita a reflexionar acerca del modo de comprender la subjetividad, la concepción diagnóstica y clínica, y las prácticas que han sido posibles en cada caso. El trabajo presenta una primera aproximación a la sistematización de estos registros de acuerdo a los distintos contextos políticos que enmarcan su aparición y la emergencia de los sesgos preprofesionales que quedan involucrados.
ABSTRACT
Clinical records, biotypological data cards, protocols, interviews,
are written documents that register the way in which practices
are really carried out. They constitute instances of construction
of discursive, conceptual consensus and ways to accede to the
practice which guarantee the conditions of knowledge roduction
in a determined moment. The historical localization of these
documents allows to show the confluence of the social, political
and ideological variables in the analysis of them because the
material boarded constitutes in the stabilization of a discursive
construction’s process which gives an explanation to the
elaboration of legitimated knowledge. The study of this matter
invites to reflect on the way of understanding the subjectivity, the
diagnostic and clinical conception, and the practices that had
been possible on each case. This work presents a first approach
to the systematization of these records according to the different
political contexts, which surrounds its appearance and the
emergence of the pre-professional turns involved.